Feuding law firms in the Facebook antitrust case told to make peace

(Reuters) – A US judge on Tuesday appointed two prominent US law firms as co-leaders of consumer claims against Meta Platforms Inc’s (META.O) Facebook, saying he hoped they would put aside their dispute over control of the antitrust case and work together.

in a court orderUS District Judge James Donato in San Francisco appointed Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan with “some reservations” given the past “rocky relationship” between the two law firms.

“It is the court’s expectation that the attorneys will treat this appointment as the start of a new day, and put behind them the conflicts that gave rise to these proceedings,” Donato wrote.

The case involves a group of consumers who contend Facebook exploited user data to maintain its market power. The company has denied the claims.

Law firms routinely vie for sole or co-leadership roles in high-profile class actions, since such appointments by judges can help steer cases and earn bigger firms cuts of legal fees.

Latest Updates

View 2 more stories

Hagens Berman partner Shana Scarlett and Quinn Emanuel partner Kevin Teruya, the two lawyers appointed to represent a prospective consumer class, did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment.

Representatives for Quinn Emanuel and Facebook declined to comment, and a spokesperson for Hagens Berman did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.

Scarlett in recent court filings said Quinn Emanuel was not respecting her view as a leading antitrust attorney based on her gender.

Quinn Emanuel denied the claim, saying it has “worked very hard to be cooperative with all the counsel in the case, including the female counsel.”

Both firms had been appointed co-counsel in 2021 by a judge who has since been elevated to a US appeals court.

Donato started the appointment process from scratch in January amid quarreling between Seattle-based plaintiffs’ firm Hagens Berman and 900-lawyer Quinn Emanuel.

The firms sought individual, sole appointment and not co-leadership.

Donato said in Tuesday’s order that the designation of co-leadership was interim and that “further reports of dysfunctionality or breakdowns in the work relationship” would likely result in the designation of new counsel.

The case is Klein v. Meta Platforms Inc, US District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 5:20-cv-08570.

For consumer class: Shana Scarlett of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro; Kevin Teruya of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan

For Facebook: Sonal Mehta, David Gringer and Ari Holtzblatt of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr

Read more:

Law firms in Meta antitrust lawsuit clash over lead role

Quinn Emanuel’s Chicago leader to depart for state judgment

US judge warns law firms in Clearview AI lawsuit over ‘disarray’

Lawyer David Boies bills $1,950 hourly in Google case, court filing shows

Reporting by Mike Scarcella; editing by Leigh Jones

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Related Posts

Previous post ‘How lucky the angels are to have you’
Next post Petito lawsuit: Laundrie attorney Steve Bertolino files motion to dismiss complaint against him